Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transverse dunes (fore-dunes), parabolic dunes, rare cliff-top dunes, and blowouts are found in Ontario. Many of these coastal dunes are land-locked on abandoned sand plains of partially drained early-post glacial lakes and seas. Others are part of coastal systems found at different stages of evolution along the Great Lakes. An idealized coastal system, as is for great part well developed at Wasaga Beach, includes the following elements: a few metres high foredunes partially deflated and breached by wave washover; low, long, narrow, marshy zones landward from the foredunes: the "pannes"; a wide sequence of numerous beach ridges capped by small (2 m high) stabilized foredunes, and separated by long shallow swales covered by water for several months of the year; intensely deflated transverse dunes which record raised coastlines of old lakes; and finally, high (up to 25 m) nested parabolic dunes showing progressive landward increase in height. These high dunes have developed over sandy, gravelly bars of early Holocene lakes, and have prograded for a short distance over lagoons. Most of the dune systems found along the Great Lakes have developed in the last 3-5000 years. Some of them have been intensely affected by man during the last two centuries, particularly by logging, agriculture, and recreational activities. Some dune fields have been completely flattened, others on the contrary have been reactivated by deforestation, and new dunes have formed and have migrated landward onto forests and cultivated fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it