MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W156528125

Alfonso Sastre's "Escuadra hacia la muerte": a liminal approach

2008· article· es· W156528125 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. Robert Lauer

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Escuadra hacia la muerte (1953),. la obra m?s famosa de Alfonso Sastre, ha sido considerada como una obra revolucionaria, existencialista, tr?gica, absurda, pol? tica y aleg?rica. A la vez, es una obra liminal, escrita entre el primer per?odo de este autor, el de sus obras propiamente subversivas, y el subsiguiente, el de sus tra gedias complejas. En este segundo per?odo (1953-1964) Sastre escribe obras experi mentales de cierto realismo social. Escuadra hacia la .muerte responde tambi?n a preocupaciones del momento, como lo fue la Guerra Fr?a y el temor europeo por una posible Tercera Guerra Mundial. Estructuralmente, Escuadra hacia la muer te sigue pautas brechtianas en lo que podr?a llamarse un drama social, aunque aqu? en sentido antropol?gico. En efecto, se puede notar, a lo largo de las dos par tes y los doce cuadros de la obra, una estructura quintuple donde se evidencia: 1) la separaci?n de ciertos individuos de su medio ambiente natural; 2) su incorpo raci?n en un espacio liminair) el momento de transici?n ocurrido despu?s de un aut?ntico sacrificio humano; 4) la separaci?n de los ne?fitos de este espacio l? mite; y 5) la reincorporaci?n de ciertos individuos dentro de una sociedad hipot? ticamente mejor. Escuadra hacia la muerte es una obra compleja y optimista en que se imagina un mundo mejor posible

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.021
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Canadiense de Estudios HispánicosSame topicComparative Literary Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207