MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1565294158 · doi:10.3138/tric.31.1.91

Aleksandar Saša Dundjerović. <i>The Theatricality of Robert Lepage</i>

2010· article· en· W1565294158 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Erin Hurley

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Research in Canada · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHistory, Culture, and Society
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComicsArtArt historyStyle (visual arts)Visual artsSociologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ALEKSANDAR SASA DUNDJEROVIC The Theatricality of Robert Lepage' Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press, 2007, 252pp. In September 2008, Montreal playwright, actor, and director Wajdi Mouawad staged his solo show, Seuls, at the Theatre d'Aujourd'hui. The play centred around Harwan, a doctoral candidate at a mythical Montreal university writing his dissertation on Robert In one to remind Lepage's agent of precisely which doctoral candidate writing on Robert Lepage he is, Harwan tells her he's writing on le cadre comme espace identitaire dans les solos de Robert Lepage. This comic moment, recognized as such by the Espace Go audience, signals not only the widespread interest in Lepage, his work, and his creative process by doctoral candidates and other kinds of academics--an interest evidenced in, for instance, the recent amply illustrated Ex Machina. Chantiers d'ecriture scenique from L'Instant scene (2007) and Ludovic Fouquet's Robert Lepage, l'horizon en images (2006). It also points to the many different ways such a multi-generic, multimedia, multilinguistic body of work might be approached. Already Lepage's theatrical productions have been examined through the lenses of sociological and postcolonial critique, of semiotics, and of intermedial performance in both French and English. Aleksandar Dundjerovic, a director and senior lecturer at the University of Manchester, whose book is derived from his own doctoral dissertation, takes a hagiographic approach. He attempts to isolate what he calls the theatricality of Lepage's work, a term which to mean style or aesthetic as tied to his creative process developed from the Repere cycles. Its key features are a transformative mise en scene, its inclusion of multiple media, and its open-ended creative process (25-6). He to attribute Lepage's international success and cross-cultural communication to this open form (4). I say seems as Dundjerovic describes the work and makes observations, but does not offer sustained analysis of, nor make any original claims about, Lepage's work, except to say that it is important and good. This makes it a sometimes confusing and, to me anyway, unfulfilling read. Like the French-language publications immediately preceding this one, Dundjerovic illuminates Lepage's creative process and his artistic preoccupations. Most chapters use a particular production as anchor for Dundjerovic's reflections on stages of Lepage's creative process; they admirably cover each of Lepage's live performance genres (solo, collective, text-based, opera) and reach from his first school tours in the late 1970s to Zulu Time in the early 2000s. Thus, La trilogie des dragons (1985-91) serves as an exemplary use of resources, the first stage of the Repere cycles Lepage developed out of his study and work with Jacques Lessard in the early 1980s. Indicative of his hagiographic approach, Dundjerovic's first chapter establishes Personal and Cultural Contexts, where a reductive view of Quebec's cultural politics is established in order to position Lepage as exceptional to his environment. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre Research in CanadaSame topicHistory, Culture, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207