Structurally Distinct Ligand-Binding or Ligand-Independent Notch1 Mutants Are Leukemogenic but Affect Thymocyte Development, Apoptosis, and Metastasis Differently
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We previously found that provirus insertion in T cell tumors of mouse mammary tumor virus/c-myc transgenic (Tg) mice induced two forms of Notch1 mutations. Type I mutations generated two truncated molecules, one intracellular (IC) (Notch1(IC)) and one extracellular (Notch1(EC)), while in type II mutations Notch1 was deleted of its C terminus (Notch1(DeltaCT)). We expressed these mutants in Tg mice using the CD4 promoter. Both Notch1(IC) and Notch1(DeltaCT), but not Notch1(EC), Tg mice developed double-positive (DP) thymomas. These disseminated more frequently in Notch1(DeltaCT) Tg mice. Double (Notch1(IC) x myc) or (Notch1(DeltaCT) x myc) Tg mice developed thymoma with a much shorter latency than single Tg mice, providing genetic evidence of a collaboration between these two oncogenes. FACS analysis of preleukemic thymocytes did not reveal major T cell differentiation anomalies, except for a higher number of DP cells and an accumulation of TCR(high)CD2(high)CD25(high) DP cells in Notch1(IC), and less so in Notch1(DeltaCT) Tg mice. This was associated with enhanced in vivo thymocyte proliferation. However, Notch1(IC), but not Notch1(DeltaCT), DP thymocytes were protected against apoptosis induced in vivo by dexamethasone and anti-CD3 and in vitro by anti-CD3/CD28 Abs. This indicates that the C terminus of Notch1 and/or the conserved regulation by its ligands have a significant impact on the induced T cell phenotype. Therefore, Notch1(IC) and Notch1(DeltaCT) behave as oncogenes for T cells. Because these two Notch1 mutations are very similar to those described in some forms of human T cell leukemia, these Tg mice may represent relevant models of these human leukemias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".