183 PREGNANCY RATE FOLLOWING TRANSFER OF IN VITRO- AND IN VIVO-PRODUCED BOVINE EMBRYOS TO LH-TREATED RECIPIENTS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective was to evaluate the effect of pLH treatment on pregnancy rates in recipients receiving in vivo- or in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Heifers (n = 37) and lactating (n = 28) and non-lactating (n = 150) beef cows were treated at random stages of the cycle with 100 µg GnRH i.m. (Cystorelin, Merial Canada Inc., Victoriaville, Quebec, Canada) on Day -9, 500 µg cloprostenol i.m. (PGF; Estrumate, Schering Plough Animal Health, Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada) on Day —2 and GnRH on Day 0 (66 h post-PGF; without estrus detection). Cattle were placed at random, by class, into three groups: no further treatment (Control; n = 71), or 12.5 mg pLH (Lutropin-V, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) on Day 5 (n = 72) or on Day 7 (n = 72) after the second GnRH. On Day 7, cattle with a CL > 10 mm in diameter (determined ultrasonically) received in vivo-produced, fresh (Simmental) or frozen (Holstein), or in vitro-produced frozen (Holstein) embryos (embryo type balanced among groups). Embryos were cryopreserved in 10% ethylene glycol; in vivo-produced frozen embryos were thawed 5 to 10 s in air, 15 s in a water-bath at 30°C and then “direct-transferred” nonsurgically. In vitro-produced frozen embryos (donated by IND Lifetech Inc., Delta, British Columbia, Canada) were thawed in a water-bath at 27°C for 10 s and placed in ViGro Holding Plus medium (AB Technology, Pullman, WA, USA) at room temperature, evaluated and then transferred nonsurgically. Pregnancy was determined by ultrasonography on Day 35. Data were analyzed with CATMOD, chi-square and GLM procedures (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.). Twenty cattle (9.3%) did not receive embryos; five heifers had cervical problems, and five heifers and 10 cows did not have a CL >10 mm. Overall, 7.1% of the recipients had two CL on the day of embryo transfer. There was no effect (P > 0.05) of treatment, embryo type (or interaction) or class of recipient on pregnancy rate (overall, 44.1%, 86/195; Table 1). Similarly, mean (±SD) CL diameter and luteal area did not differ (P > 0.05) among groups or between pregnant and open recipients (overall, 22.0 ± 3.4 mm and 352.0 ± 108.7 mm, respectively). However, recipients with a CL diameter =18 mm tended (P < 0.1) to have a higher pregnancy rate (45.8 vs 25.0%). In a subset of 40 recipients examined ultrasonically on Day 12, 50% of those treated on Day 5 and 70% of those treated with pLH on Day 7 had two CL. In summary, overall pregnancy rate in GnRH-synchronized recipients receiving in vitro- or in vivo-produced embryos by nonsurgical transfer was 44.1%. Embryo survival to Day 35 was not affected by type of embryo or treatment with pLH 5 or 7 days after ovulation. Table 1 Pregnancy rate in recipients on Day 35 based on pLH treatment and embryo-type
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it