Hydroxyurea for sickle cell disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease is one of the most common inherited diseases world wide. It is associated with life long morbidity and a reduced life expectancy. Hydroxyurea, a chemotherapeutic drug taken by mouth, raises fetal haemoglobin and, as such, is expected to ameliorate some of the clinical problems of sickle cell disease. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of hydroxyurea therapy in sickle cell disease patients of all types, of any age, regardless of setting. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group specialised register of controlled trials for haemoglobinopathies, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, hand-searching relevant journals, and hand-searching abstract books of conference proceedings. Date of the most recent search(es): November 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing the use of oral hydroxyurea for one month or longer with placebo, standard therapy or other interventions for the treatment of patients with sickle cell disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data from the two studies included. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty trials were found of which two trials, which reported results from a total of 324 adults and children were suitable for inclusion in the review. From the data provided in the published reports only one study (the MSH study to the United States of America) could be analysed. This study showed marked differences in favour of hydroxyurea treatment as compared with placebo in terms of annual crisis rate, use of transfusions, and life-threatening complications (in particular, the acute sickle chest syndrome). No serious adverse effects were reported from either study. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: While hydroxyurea appears both effective and safe in the severely affected SS adults over a two year period; further studies are required to elucidate its role in other patient groups and for other conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.024 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".