MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1566270415 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002202

Hydroxyurea for sickle cell disease

2001· review· en· W1566270415 on OpenAlexaff
Ashley P Jones, Sally C. Davies, Adebayo Olujohungbe

Bibliographic record

VenueCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCancerCare Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdverse effectDiseaseAcute chest syndromePlaceboClinical trialPediatricsMeta-analysisLife expectancyPsychological interventionHydroxycarbamideInternal medicineSickle cell anemiaIntensive care medicinePopulationAlternative medicinePathologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease is one of the most common inherited diseases world wide. It is associated with life long morbidity and a reduced life expectancy. Hydroxyurea, a chemotherapeutic drug taken by mouth, raises fetal haemoglobin and, as such, is expected to ameliorate some of the clinical problems of sickle cell disease. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of hydroxyurea therapy in sickle cell disease patients of all types, of any age, regardless of setting. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group specialised register of controlled trials for haemoglobinopathies, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, hand-searching relevant journals, and hand-searching abstract books of conference proceedings. Date of the most recent search(es): November 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing the use of oral hydroxyurea for one month or longer with placebo, standard therapy or other interventions for the treatment of patients with sickle cell disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data from the two studies included. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty trials were found of which two trials, which reported results from a total of 324 adults and children were suitable for inclusion in the review. From the data provided in the published reports only one study (the MSH study to the United States of America) could be analysed. This study showed marked differences in favour of hydroxyurea treatment as compared with placebo in terms of annual crisis rate, use of transfusions, and life-threatening complications (in particular, the acute sickle chest syndrome). No serious adverse effects were reported from either study. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: While hydroxyurea appears both effective and safe in the severely affected SS adults over a two year period; further studies are required to elucidate its role in other patient groups and for other conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsFrench-language works237,207