MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1566408183 · doi:10.1029/2009wr008881

Experimental investigation of dynamic effects in capillary pressure: Grain size dependency and upscaling

2010· article· en· W1566408183 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Geremy Camps‐Roach, Denis M. O’Carroll, Tim Newson, Toshihiro Sakaki, Tissa H. Illangasekare

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCapillary pressureSaturation (graph theory)Capillary actionMechanicsMaterials scienceCapillary numberGrain sizeGeotechnical engineeringThermodynamicsSoil sciencePorous mediumGeologyMathematicsComposite materialPorosityPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The macroscopic flow equations used to predict two‐phase flow typically utilizes a capillary pressure‐saturation relationship determined under equilibrium conditions. Theoretical reasoning, experimental evidence, and numerical modeling results have indicated that when one fluid phase replaces another fluid, this relationship may not be unique but may depend on the rate at which the phase saturations change in response to changes in phase pressures. This nonuniqueness likely depends on a variety of factors including soil‐fluid properties and possibly physical scale. To quantify this dependency experimentally, direct measurements of equilibrium and dynamic capillary pressure‐saturation relationships were developed for two Ottawa sands with different grain sizes using a 20 cm long column. A number of replicate air‐water experiments were conducted to facilitate statistical comparison of capillary pressure‐saturation relationships. Water and air pressures and phase saturations were measured at three different vertical locations in the sand column under different desaturation rates (1) to measure local capillary pressure‐saturation relationships (static and dynamic); (2) to quantify the dynamic coefficient τ , a measure of the magnitude of observed dynamic effects, as a function of water saturation for different grain sizes and desaturation rates; (3) to investigate the importance of grain size on measured dynamic effects; and (4) to assess the importance of sample scale on the magnitude of dynamic effects in capillary pressure. A comparison of the static and dynamic P c ‐ S w relationships showed that at a given water saturation, capillary pressure measured under transient water drainage conditions is statistically larger than capillary pressure measured under equilibrium or static conditions, consistent with thermodynamic theory. The dynamic coefficient τ , used in the expression relating the static and dynamic capillary pressures to the desaturation rate was dependant on porous media mean grain size but not on the desaturation rate. Results also suggest that the magnitude of the dynamic coefficient did not increase with the increased averaging volume considered in this study, as has been reported in the literature. This work suggests that dynamic effects in capillary pressure should be included in numerical models used to predict multiphase flow in systems when saturations change rapidly, particularly in fine‐grained soil systems (e.g., CO 2 sequestration, enhanced oil recovery, air sparging for remediation).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207