MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1566580034 · doi:10.32316/hse/rhe.v24i1.4083

Education At Work, Literacy at the Resource Frontier: A Matter of Life and Death

2012· article· en· W1566580034 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Terry Wilde

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsDominican University CollegeLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierFunctional illiteracyHumanitiesLiteracyImmigrationResource (disambiguation)SociologyEthnologyPolitical scienceArtPedagogyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThis article looks at an under-researched aspect of rural education: adult literacy educationalong Ontario’s resource frontier in the early twentieth century. Workers in mining, lumberingand railroads were male; many were immigrants who wanted to earn enough either to establishhomes in Ontario or return home with a viable stake. The majority did not read or speakEnglish fluently which, directly and indirectly, led to injuries and accidents. I examine thenascent attempts of educators like Alfred Fitzpatrick to teach elementary reading and writingto these men. Their willingness to participate in the process was, however, limited by factorssuch as exhaustion at the end of a long shift; gender and cultural prejudices; and competingmasculinities. The resource frontier was remote and isolated. The work was hard and dangerous.The inability to read and communicate made it more so. This article sheds light on someof the reasons why illiteracy persisted for so long.RésuméCet article jette un regard sur un aspect peu connu de l’éducation en milieu rural : l’alphabétisationdes adultes aux confins des terres habitées de l’Ontario au début du vingtième siècle.Dans les industries forestière, minière et ferroviaire les ouvriers étaient des hommes; beaucoupd’entre eux étaient des immigrants qui voulaient gagner suffisamment d’argent pour s’établirdans cette province ou retourner dans leurs pays d’origine avec une somme d’argent substantielle.La majorité ne savait ni lire ni parler anglais couramment ce qui, directement ouindirectement, entrainait des accidents et des blessures. Nous traitons des premières tentativesd’éducateurs tels qu’Alfred Fitzpatrick pour enseigner les rudiments de la lecture et de l’écritureà ces hommes. Leur volonté d’apprendre était cependant entravée par des facteurs tels quel’épuisement dû au travail, des préjugés culturels ou de genre et l’influence des modèles demasculinité. Ces régions étaient peu peuplées et isolées. Le travail était difficile et dangereux.L’incapacité de lire et de communiquer empirait la situation. Cet article expose certaines desraisons qui ont favorisé la persistance de l’analphabétisme aussi longtemps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducationSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207