MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Identification of a novel antigen presenting cell population modulating anti-influenza type-2 immunity (131.3)

2009· article· en· W1566721416 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jae‐Kwang Yoo, Carole L. Galligan, Daniel J. Burke, Carl Virtanen, Eleanor N. Fish

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyImmunologyPopulationAdoptive cell transferImmune systemInfluenza A virusImmunityT cellAntigenVirusVirologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Anti-influenza type 2 (T2) immunity contributes to both immunoprotection and immunopathology, yet the underlying mechanisms modulating T2 immunity remain ill-defined. Here, we describe a novel murine antigen (Ag) presenting cell (APC) population, designated virus activated plasmacytoid (VAP) cells: mPDCA1+CD11c-TcR-β-B220-CD19-CD38+CD44intCD45+Gr1+. VAP cells are bone marrow derived leukocytes. Phenotypic, morphologic and molecular characterization distinguished VAP cells from other immune cell populations. Pulmonary influenza A virus infection activates circulating VAP cells to enter the lungs and produce interleukin (IL)-25, a strong inducer of T2 pulmonary inflammation. Subsequently, VAP cells capture viral Ag in the lungs and migrate to the draining lymph node (DLN) and spleen, with delayed kinetics relative to DCs, where they show APC activity. In the DLN, influenza virus activated VAP cells produce IL-4 and induce T helper (TH) 2 effector cell polarization by modulating GATA-3 expression. Finally, adoptive transfer of influenza virus activated VAP cells enhanced TH2 effector T cell responses in influenza virus infected recipient mice and subsequently, anti-influenza T2 humoral responses including IgG1 and G2b were significantly increased. Collectively, our results highlight the importance of VAP cells as novel immuno-modulators of T2 immunity against influenza A virus infection in mouse. These studies were supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant MOP-15094 to E.N.F. J.K.Y. was supported by a Connaught Scholarship and an Ontario Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicInfluenza Virus Research Studies→French-language works237,207→