Effectiveness of enhanced external counterpulsation in patients with left main disease and angina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a noninvasive device that uses three pairs of sequentially inflated pneumatic cuffs applied to the lower extremities and synchronized with the heart beat to provide diastolic augmentation, increase coronary blood pressure and flow, venous return and cardiac output, and decrease afterload. HYPOTHESIS: This study examines the safety and effectiveness of EECP therapy in patients with significant left main coronary artery disease (LMD). METHODS: In all, 2,861 patients enrolled in the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR) were divided into three groups, those without LMD (n = 2,377), those with LMD and prior CABG (n = 431), and those with unbypassed LMD (n = 53). RESULTS: Patients with LMD, with or without prior CABG, were significantly more likely to have triple-vessel disease (98.1 and 88.7%, respectively) than patients without LMD (41.9%). Post-EECP, 74% without LMD, 75% with LMD with prior CABG, and 65% with unbypassed LMD improved their Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina by at least one class (p = NS). There were no differences in the mean decrease in weekly angina episodes (7.1 vs. 8.0 vs. 7.6) and in the mean frequency of weekly nitroglycerin use (6.6 vs. 8.1 vs. 8.9). At 6-month follow-up, the CCS class improved further in all three groups, and there was a further reduction in mean weekly angina episodes (4.7 vs. 4.6 vs. 5.3) and nitroglycerin use (6.5 vs. 6.8 vs. 8.2). Kaplan-Meier life table analysis 8 months after starting EECP demonstrated a major cardiovascular event rate of 11.2% in patients without LMD, 15.6% in LMD with CABG, and 24.3% in LMD without prior CABG. Late mortality in unbypassed LMD was 13.2% (confidence interval [CI] 3.3-23.1) versus 4.8% (CI 2.7-7.1) in LMD with CABG, and 2.8% (CI 2.1-3.5) without LMD (p = 0.0039 by log-rank test). CONCLUSION: Enhanced external counterpulsation is equally effective in relieving angina in patients with or without LMD. However, the significantly increased late mortality in patients with LMD without prior CABG suggests that early revascularization should be considered in these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".