MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1567178154

International and Domestic Selective Adaptation: The Case of Charter 08

2012· article· en· W1567178154 on OpenAlexaff
Pitman B. Potter

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicConflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharterPolitical scienceLegitimacyNormativeLaw and economicsPoliticsInterpretation (philosophy)LawSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Legal transfers can be understood as involving complex processes by which particular understandings about legal phenomena are exchanged across distance and time. The theory of offers important opportunities for understanding legal transfers through its attention to the relationship between acceptance of doctrinal standards and assimilation of underlying norms. The dissident human rights document recently circulated in China under the title 'Charter 08' is an exercise of both international and sub-national adaptation.In the first part of this chapter the author examines the basic contours of Charter 08, reflecting on the ways in which this radical call for Chinese political and legal reform applies norms of liberalism to Chinese legal and political orthodoxies. In the second part, he offers an interpretation of Charter 08 framed by reference to the theory of selective adaptation, which posits that normative perspectives have a significant influence on local interpretation and implementation of international legal texts and standards. More particularly, the author explains how the theory of selective adaptation identifies perception, complementarity (between local and international practices and values) and legitimacy (the extent to which interpretative and local communities accept the aims and impacts of a transfer) as factors that enable an analysis of a transfer’s prospects of assimilation. This analysis challenges assumptions about the convergence of legal systems across normative divides. While Charter 08 draws upon principles of law and governance found in international discourse of liberalism, perhaps the most intriguing aspect of the Charter is its authors' reliance on established policy discourses of the Chinese Party-state as the basis for principles and policies of reform. Thus, Charter 08 reveals the phenomenon of selective adaptation in both the international and sub-national context. This chapter will examine these aspects of Charter 08, with particular attention given to selective adaptation's elements of perception, complementarity and legitimacy. It will offer a case study of the normative dimensions of legal transfers in a human rights context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicConflict of Laws and JurisdictionFrench-language works237,207