MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1567372722 · doi:10.5772/14765

Oxytocin as an Inducer of Cardiomyogenesis

2011· book-chapter· en· W1567372722 on OpenAlexafffund
Jolanta Gutkowska, Marek Jankowski

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsInducerOxytocinNeurosciencePsychologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first description of the uterotonic action of pituitary extracts was first described by Sir Henry A few years later, Ott and Scott demonstrated that besides the effect on uterine activity, posterior pituitary extracts also promoted milk ejection These are the 2 principal activities of oxytocin (OT), the structure and synthesis of which were not elucidated until 50 years later by Du Vigneaud and co-workers OT is mainly produced in the paraventricular nucleus and supraoptic nucleus of the hypothalamus, and released from hypothalamic nerve terminals of the posterior pituitary, where it is stored, into the bloodstreem. OT differs, by only two amino acids, from vasopressin (AVP), which is also produced in these nuclei and stored in the posterior pituitary. It was previously believed that OT as well as AVP were exclusively released from the neurohypophysis although Early studies associated OT with cardiovascular system Paton and Watson first described the blood pressure (BP) depressor response to posterior pituitary extract in avians Hogben & Schlapp confirmed their findings and showed the effect of whole posterior pituitary extracts in amphibians and reptiles (Hogben & Schlapp, 1924). Furthermore, this effect was evoked by histamine-free extracts and was therefore a pituitary action. When separated fractions of posterior pituitary extracts obtained by fractional precipitation became available, Gaddum showed that the depressor response was attributable to the only one fraction, called oxytocin, which had oxytocic properties These observations were completely overlooked. However, recent studies have shown that OT is an ubiquitous hormone, synthesized at many locis, and a wide array of physiological activities has been attributed to this peptide. Similar numbers of oxytocinergic neurons have been found in the male and female hypothalamus, and the same stimuli induce OT release in both genders, suggesting other physiological functions that its role in female reproduction. In fact, OT receptors (OTR) are also widely expressed in diverse tissues such as the pituitary, kidney, ovary, testis, thymus, heart, vascular endothelium, osteoclasts, myoblasts, pancreatic islets, adipocytes and several types of cancer cells OT elicits a variety of physiological responses such as complex sexual and maternal behavior. Indeed, OT is also involved in www.intechopen.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInTech eBooksSame topicNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorFrench-language works237,207