MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1567644419

Lawmaking on the Road to International Summits

2009· article· en· W1567644419 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eric Dannenmaier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Institutional Repository at DePaul University (DePaul University) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawmakingSummitPolitical sciencePublic administrationDemocracyRegionalism (politics)State (computer science)Civil societyInternational lawPolitical economyPoliticsLawSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMITSsovereign states.Former Interim Permanent Representative of the United States to the United Nations John Bolton 17 is a prominent critic of an international governance role for civil society.18 Similarly, Kenneth Anderson has decried the threat that non-state actors, principally international NGOs, pose to "the sovereignty of democratic states."'19 Bolton, Anderson, and other critics reject transnational collaboration outside traditional diplomatic channels as an unaccountable, illegitimate, and even undemocratic threat to vital conceptions of sovereignty.20 One key metaphor that Bolton uses when challenging non-state access to international process is a claim that this access pro-17.Bolton was appointed by President George W. Bush in a recess appointment after Bolton failed to receive confirmation from the Senate, and he served from August 2005 until December 2006.He resigned when his recess appointment would have ended.See Helene Cooper, Bush Drops Bid to Keep Bolton as UN Envoy, INT'L

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.011
Scholarly communication0.0140.010
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Institutional Repository at DePaul University (DePaul University)Same topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207