MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1567668280 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab41

41 EFFECT OF CELL TYPES AND PASSAGES ON DEVELOPMENT AND APOPTOSIS OF PORCINE CLONED EMBRYOS

2004· article· en· W1567668280 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J.-G. Kim, Y.-S. Lee, S.-L. Lee, Sun A Ock, C.-S. Park, S.Y. Choe, Gyu‐Jin Rho

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsSomatic cell nuclear transferBlastocystAndrologyTheriogenologyEmbryoBiologyCytoplastOocyteReproductive technologyEmbryo cultureFetusEnucleationEmbryogenesisApoptosisSomatic cellMolecular biologyCell biologyGeneticsPregnancyMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to improve the efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) in pigs by assessing the development, cell numbers and apoptosis when using different cell types as nuclear donors and different numbers of passages. Primary cultures of the donor cells, porcine fetal fibroblasts (pFFF) from a female fetus at ~30 days of gestation and adult female ear skin cells (pAESC), were established in DMEM + 15% FCS. For nuclear donor, cells at different passages were cultured for 5 days until confluent. Cumulus-oocyte complexes were matured and fertilized in vitro as controls by the following methods (2000 Theriogenology 54, 787–797). Following enucleation, oocytes were reconstructed by transfer of donor cells and fusion with two DC pulses (1.4 kV/cm, 50 µs) in 0.28 M mannitol containing 0.01 mM CaCl2 and MgCl2. Eggs were then cultured in NCSU23 + 1.9 mM 6-dimethylaminopurine for 3 h. SCNT and IVF embryos were cultured in NCSU23 for 54 h and subsequently in the same medium with 5.55 mM glucose for 90 h at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in air. In Experiment 1, when the rates of development between IVF and SCNT embryos constituted with cells at 5–7 passages were compared, no significant (P < 0.05) differences were observed in the cleavage rates. The rates of blastocyst formation were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in IVF than in SCNT embryos with pFFF and pAESC (21% vs. 15% and 10%), but it did not differ between SCNT embryos. Total cell numbers in IVF blastocysts (35.4 ± 12) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than in SCNT blastocysts with pFFF and pAESC (28.4 ± 8 and 26.2 ± 10, respectively). The apoptosis signal by TUNEL was initiated at Day 3 in IVF and SCNT embryos. Apoptosis rates in SCNT blastocysts with pFFF and pAESC (13.1 ± 2.5 and 16.6 ± 4.3, respectively) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than in IVF embryos (3.6 ± 1.4). As the embryos developed, the rates of apoptosis were increased. On Day 6, the rates of apoptosis in IVF (4.8%) were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than those in SCNT embryos with pFFF (13.1%) and pAESC (16.6%). However, both total cell number and apoptosis in SCNT embryos with pFFF and pAESC revealed no significant differences. In Experiment 2, SCNT embryos with pFFF in different cell passages were compared for the development and apoptosis. No significant (P < 0.05) differences were observed in the cleavage rates of SCNT embryos among different cell passages. The rates of blastocyst formation were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in SCNT embryos with 5–7 passages than those with other numbers of passages (14% vs. 6–8%, respectively). Although total cell numbers of SCNT blastocysts did not differ among different cell passages, apoptosis rates were significantly (P < 0.05) higher when the number of cell passages was increased. These results suggest that fetal fibroblasts at 5–7 passages are ideal nuclear donor cells for obtaining high-quality porcine SCNT embryos. This work was supported by grant No. 1000520040020000 from Biogreen 21, Republic of Korea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207