MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1567962728 · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-3091

Local and regional approaches to studying the phenology and biological control of the soybean aphid

2010· dissertation· en· W1567962728 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicholas P. Schmidt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenologyAphidSoybean aphidBiologyBiological pest controlAgronomyAphididaeEcologyBotanyPEST analysisHomoptera

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soybean aphids Aphis glycines Matsumura (Hemiptera: Aphididae) are an economic pest of soybean Glycine max (L.) Merr. in much of the United States and parts of Canada. Some crucial phenological information of A. glycines is unknown, specifically source-sink dynamics between and within host plants and factors guiding aphid migrations. In addition, there are discrepancies in the literature on the importance of food webs and how local landscape effects can alter A. glycines populations. Increasing our understanding of A. glycines population dynamics may improve predictions of aphid outbreaks and integrated pest management efforts. The first objective was to determine how landscape composition and heterogeneity impact A. glycines and their natural predator community. This study was centered in and around the Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge located in Jasper County, Iowa. A second objective was to determine how prairie plantings adjacent to soybean impact A. glycines and natural enemy populations. To accomplish this, four study sites in central Iowa, transects were established up to 200 m in both soybean and prairie. A third objective was to describe A. glycines movement patterns on a regional scale. We monitored winged aphids (alates) using a suction trap network established at 42 locations over 10 states. Alates where correlated with northern latitudes which led to the last objective which was to predict A. glycines using low temperature data from the Midwest US and determine whether temperatures have reached A. glycines supercooling point (-34oC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207