MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1568072156 · doi:10.4103/1735-1995.158313

Geogenic thallium and lead pollution in soils and potential risk of toxicity: A report from Iran

2015· article· en· W1568072156 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Reza Afshari, Masumeh Taheri, Jalil Mehrzad, Mohamad HoseinMahmudy Gharaie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Research in Medical Sciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicThallium and Germanium Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThalliumMedicinePollutionToxicityEnvironmental chemistrySoil waterLead (geology)Environmental healthEnvironmental scienceMetallurgyGeologyInternal medicineSoil scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir, Exposure to thallium (Tl: Atomic weight of 204.38 and atomic number of 81) and lead (Pb: 207.21 and 82) are important global health-ill problem in particular in developing world.[1,2] These elements are derived from two sources anthropogenic or geogenic.[2] To date, the later has been underestimated in health. It is shown that geogenic thallium and lead are associated with mineralization of hydrothermal and pyrite mineral, and coal deposits.[3] Thallium is generally present in very low concentrations in soils generally range from 0.01 to 3 mg/kg.[4] These concentrations are not properly established; however, most soils contain thallium at concentrations of <1 mg/kg.[3] Concentration of Lead in natural soil is varied from 2 to 200 mg/kg (average 10) mg/kg.[5] We have previously reported anthropogenic thallium and lead exposure and toxicities from Iran due to occupational environments, food sources and even adulterated opioid abuse.[6,7] There is geological potential of thallium and lead in Chelpu area. There are many diseases in this area that could be associated with the presence of these two toxic elements. Therefore, we evaluated thallium and lead in soil in Chelpu area that could potentially contribute in toxic exposure. 26 soil samples were collected from Chelpu catchment area, North east Iran. Soil samples were passed through a 120 mesh sieve and crushed. The samples were then analyzed for thallium and lead levels using ICP-ES via Iranian Geological Organization, Tehran. Mean (SD, min-max) thallium and lead concentrations in soil were 3.64 (0.88, 2.2-5.4) and 12.13 (7.57, 0.6-26.5), respectively, (n = 26). These values are comparable with international reports [Table 1]. Table 1 Thallium and lead concentrations in soil samples of Chelpu in comparison to baseline values of natural soils We found that thallium concentration in Chelpu soil samples was higher than natural soils reported from other geographical regions including International, Chinese and Canadian guidelines.[3,8,9] Lead concentration in Chelpu soil samples was also higher than natural soils in world but lower than natural Chinese soils and Canadian guidelines.[3,5,9] There have been some attempts to establish guidance for preventive measures related to lead pollution and toxicity in Iran. Physicians should be aware of potential consequences related to chronic thallium and lead toxicities in some regions. Sporadic refractory lead toxicities could also be associated with geogenic exposure. Further studies are needed to determine the extent of health impact of geogenic thallium and lead exposures in the area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Research in Medical SciencesSame topicThallium and Germanium StudiesFrench-language works237,207