Word Made Flesh: Czech Women's Writing from Communism to Post-Communism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God… And the Word became flesh and lived among us… (John 1:1; 1:14 NRSV) I begin with a rather "revelationary" quote because my endeavor in this essay may appear rather apocryphal: I will attempt a synoptic account of the transition of Czech women's fiction from communism to post-communism.Given the diversity of Czech authors in this period, and more importantly, the difficulty of defining a body of "Czech women's writing" within this corpus, I can only offer you a parabolic parable -that Czech women's fiction transfigured in the shift from communism to post communism from "word to flesh."The bare-bone skeleton of my argument may be structured thus: in communism, language, both in its oppressive and resistant forms, established the Word as the paradigm defining both the Czech governing economy and the resistant literary economy -"the Word was God."Moreover, this Word, both in its totalizing, totalitarian communalism and its dissident denunciation advocating universal human rights, formulated itself in collective and generic terms.Conversely, in post-communism, "the Word became Flesh": the shift to a market economy, private property and democracy favored a turn to individualism, material concerns, and emphasis on the body -materializing the former symbolic abstractions into localized, individualized particularity.Fleshing out how Czech women's literature is gendered in these two different political systems might be summarized thus: in communism, women were "incarcerated" by the word; their gendered, individual concerns were erased by the language of universal human rights.In contrast, women in post-communism are seeking to regain their gendered identity, their individual agency, their personal subjectivity, becoming "flesh incarnate."This transformation, I argue, intimates an intriguing permutation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".