MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1568918982 · doi:10.1007/11527695

Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing: 7th International Conference, SAT 2004, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 10-13, 2004, Revised Selected Papers

2005· book· en· W1568918982 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Holger H. Hoos, David G. M. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFormal Methods in Verification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoolean satisfiability problemTrue quantified Boolean formulaSatisfiabilityConjunctive normal formMaximum satisfiability problemMathematicsDPLL algorithmBoolean data typeSolverDiscrete mathematicsAlgorithmComputer scienceTheoretical computer scienceBoolean functionMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mapping Problems with Finite-Domain Variables to Problems with Boolean Variables.- Mapping Problems with Finite-Domain Variables to Problems with Boolean Variables.- A SAT-Based Decision Procedure for the Boolean Combination of Difference Constraints.- An Algebraic Approach to the Complexity of Generalized Conjunctive Queries.- Incremental Compilation-to-SAT Procedures.- Resolve and Expand.- Looking Algebraically at Tractable Quantified Boolean Formulas.- Derandomization of Schuler's Algorithm for SAT.- Polynomial Time SAT Decision, Hypergraph Transversals and the Hermitian Rank.- QBF Reasoning on Real-World Instances.- Automatic Extraction of Functional Dependencies.- Algorithms for Satisfiability Using Independent Sets of Variables.- Aligning CNF- and Equivalence-Reasoning.- Using DPLL for Efficient OBDD Construction.- Approximation Algorithm for Random MAX-kSAT.- Clause Form Conversions for Boolean Circuits.- From Spin Glasses to Hard Satisfiable Formulas.- CirCUs: A Hybrid Satisfiability Solver.- Equivalence Models for Quantified Boolean Formulas.- Search vs. Symbolic Techniques in Satisfiability Solving.- Worst Case Bounds for Some NP-Complete Modified Horn-SAT Problems.- Satisfiability Threshold of the Skewed Random k-SAT.- NiVER: Non-increasing Variable Elimination Resolution for Preprocessing SAT Instances.- Analysis of Search Based Algorithms for Satisfiability of Propositional and Quantified Boolean Formulas Arising from Circuit State Space Diameter Problems.- UBCSAT: An Implementation and Experimentation Environment for SLS Algorithms for SAT and MAX-SAT.- SAT Solver Competition and QBF Solver Evaluation (Invited Papers).- Fifty-Five Solvers in Vancouver: The SAT 2004 Competition.- March_eq: Implementing Additional Reasoning into an Efficient Look-Ahead SAT Solver.- Zchaff2004: An Efficient SAT Solver.- The Second QBF Solvers Comparative Evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicFormal Methods in VerificationFrench-language works237,207