MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1569035116 · doi:10.3138/9781442690363

Perceptions of the Second Sophistic and Its Times - Regards sur la Seconde Sophistique et son époque

2011· book· fr· W1569035116 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pascale Fleury, Thomas Larsen Schmidt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesArt historyPortraitPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction by Thomas Schmidt (Universite de Fribourg) and Pascale Fleury (Universite Laval) PART I : Essence et presence de la Seconde Sophistique * Narrative of Cultural Geography in Philostratus' Lives of the Sophists by Adam Kemezis (University of Alberta) * The Second Sophistic and Non-Elite Speakers by Ian Henderson (McGill University) * L'Heracles d'Herode: heroisme et philosophie dans la sophistique de Philostrate by Dominque Cote (University of Ottawa) PART II: L'orateur et son image * L'orateur oracle: une image sophistique by Pascale Fleury * Portrait d'un rheteur: Aelius Aristide comme inite mystique et athlete dans les Discours sacres by Janet Downie (Princeton University) * Une ecriture du visuel au temps de la Seconde Sophistique: Clement d'Alexandrie (Protreptique) et Philostrate (Images) by Anne Pasquier (Universite Laval) PART III: Passe et identite grecque * Sophistes, barbares et identite grecques: le cas de dion Chrysostome by Thomas Schmidt * Reflets de l'hellenisme chez Athenee a travers l'emploi des termes [...] by Marie-Helene Mainguy (Universite Laval) * Pausanias le Periegete et la Seconde Sophistique by Janick Auberger (Universite du Quebec a Montreal) PART IV: Texte, tradition et performance * Dance and Discourse in Plutarch's Table Talks 9.15 by Karin Schlapbach (University of Ottawa) * Galen on [...] by Sean Alexander Gurd (Concordia University) PART V: Heritage et influence de la Seconde Sophistique * Were the Speeches of Aelius Aristides rediscovered in the 350s p.C.? by John Vanderspoel (University of Calgary) * Libanius' Monody for Daphne (Or. 60) and the Eleusinios Logos of Aelius Aristides by Diane Johnson (University of Western Washington) * Themistios et la Seconde Sophistique: le theme du tyran by Christian R. Raschle (Universite de Montreal)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207