MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Overexpression of the signaling adapter FRS2 reconstitutes the cell cycle deficit of a nerve growth factor non‐responsive TrkA receptor mutant

2002· article· en· W1569363665 on OpenAlexafffund
Guo-qian Zeng, Susan O. Meakin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityRobarts Clinical Trials
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital
KeywordsNerve growth factorCell biologyNeuriteTropomyosin receptor kinase ALow-affinity nerve growth factor receptorCyclin-dependent kinase 1Cell cycleBiologyCell cycle checkpointCyclin D1ChemistryCancer researchReceptorCellBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have characterized the cell cycle deficit of a novel TrkA receptor mutant (TrkAS3) that fails to support nerve growth factor (NGF)-dependent cell cycle arrest and neurite outgrowth. TrkAS3 receptors fail to support an NGF-dependent increase in the expression of cyclin D1 and the cell cycle inhibitor, p21(Waf1/Cip1), two important regulators of G(1) /S transition, and do not down-regulate expression of the G(2) /M phase marker, cdc2/cdk1, or the S phase marker, proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Moreover, NGF-activated TrkAS3 receptors do not down-regulate cyclin-dependent kinase 4 phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein, essential for G(1) arrest, in comparison to NGF-activated wild-type TrkA. Collectively these data indicate that TrkAS3 receptors fail to support NGF-dependent G(1) arrest. Interestingly, ectopic expression of regulators of G(1) /S arrest, such as cyclin D1 or inhibitors of cell cycle (p21(Waf1/Cip1), p16(INK4A) ), or the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor substrate-2 (FRS2) in cells expressing TrkAS3 reconstitutes NGF-dependent neurite outgrowth. Collectively, these data suggest a model in which NGF-stimulated TrkA-dependent activation of FRS2 supports neurite outgrowth through a mechanism that likely involves the induction of p21(Waf1/Cip1) expression and the arrest of cells at G(1) /S.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207