Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the contributions of G.M. Dawson (1849-1901) to our understanding of the glaciation of the Interior Plains and Cordillera of Western Canada. Dawson is highly esteemed in the history of Canadian geology for his extensive explorations beginning in 1873, which contributed greatly to our knowledge of geography and the geology of Western Canada. The distances travelled and the areas described by Dawson were truly astonishing - hard to comprehend as the accomplishment of a man who was stunted in growth and deformed in stature by a childhood spinal disease,which was indirectly responsible for his early death. Dawson is most widely recognized for his conception of a Cordilleran over British Columbia, which has proved correct, and continues to be refined rather than revised. This should have placed him squarely within the group of later nineteenth century Canadian geologists who switched their allegiance from the Drift Theory to the Glacier Theory, or who matured wholly with the latter. However, from this first detailed examination of Dawson's works on glaciation, it emerges that, except for the Cordilleran hypothesis, in a majority of cases he argued not even the most obvious objections or the plainest of alternatives to his 'Drift' explanations, although he cannot have been unaware of them. No explanation of this rigidity readily presents itself, other than possible filial respect for the reputation of his scientifically conservative father, J.W Dawson. Dawson's later contemporaries, including Bell, Low and Tyrrell, ignored rather than challenged his interpretations, developing 'Glacial' theory along paths it has followed to the present day. Resume Le present article porte sur l'apport de G.M. Dawson (1849-1901) a la comprehension du des plaines interieures et des cordilleres de l'Ouest canadien. Dawson est une figure emblematique de l'histoire de la geologie canadienne de par l'importance des travaux d'exploration qu'il a debute en 1873 et qui ont tant contribue a notre connaissance de la geographie et de la geologie de l'Ouest canadien. Les distances qu'il a parcourues et l'etendue des regions qu'il a decrites etonnent vraiment, d'autant qu'ils ont ete realises par un homme dont le developpement avait ete entrave par une maladie spinale d'enfance responsable d'un handicap morphologique et indirectement responsable de mort prematuree. On le reconnait surtout pour son concept deglacier cordillerien recouvrant la Colombie-Britannique, dont la realite s'est averee et qui fait l'objet de raffinement plutot que de correction. Par ses idees, il aurait du faire partie integrante du groupe des geologues canadiens de la fin du dix-neuvieme siecle dont l'allegeance est passee de la marine a la glaciaire ou dont la carriere s'est dans le cadre de cette derniere. Cependant, des resultats de cette premiere etude detaillee des travaux de Dawson sur le glaciaire, il ressort qu'hormis l'hypothese du glacier cordillerien, dans la majorite des cas, il n'a par discute des objections les plus patentes ou des possibilites les plus evidentes a ses explications allochtones, et cela malgre qu'il soit inconcevable qu'il n'en n'ait pas ete au courant. On ne voit pas d'explication de cette rigidite intellectuelle, autre que celle possible du respect filial pour la reputation de son pere, J.W. Dawson, scientifique conservateur. Les contemporains de fin de carriere de Dawson, dont Bell, Low et Tyrrell, ont tout simplement ignore ses interpretations au lieu de les contester, en developpant la theorie autochtone selon des voies suivies jusqu'a nos jours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".