MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1571529941

Geoheritage 3. Attracting Students to the Earth Sciences: An Example of Individual and Collective Outreach Efforts by Industry, Academia and Secondary Education

2009· article· en· W1571529941 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Carl‐Georg Bank, Deryk Jackson, L. Hymers

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Canada · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeography Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsProspectors & Developers Association of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceOutreachHumanitiesLibrary scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Too few Canadian high-school students are pursuing post-secondary studies and career opportunities in the earth sciences. Given Canada’s wealth of renewable and non-renewable resources and their importance to society, it is imperative that students become literate in the earth sciences, and that they are encouraged to pursue career opportunities in the many fields that constitute the earth sciences. To achieve these goals, a number of out-reach efforts by members of industry, academia and secondary education have been initiated. We outline here an example of our own collaboration in one such program directed not only at students, but also at primary and secondary teachers, university faculty, industry representatives and government officials. Our program has achieved significant results, and so will continue. Others interested in increasing the profile of the earth sciences are encouraged to explore such new out-reach approaches. SOMMAIRE Trop peu d’eleves des ecoles secondaires au Canada poursuivent des etudes en sciences de la Terre et choisissent d’y faire carriere. Etant donne la richesse du Canada en ressources renouvelables et non-renouvelables et leurs importances pour le bien commun, il est absolument essentiel que les eleves acquierent des connaissances de base en sciences de la Terre et soit encourager a embrasser des carrieres dans l’une des nombreuses specialites du champ des sciences de la Terre. Pour y arriver, un certain nombre d’initiatives de sensibilisation ont ete lancees par des membres du secteur industriel, du monde universitaire, et de l’education secondaire. Nous decrivons brievement ci-dessous notre collaboration dans le cadre d’un programme du genre visant non seulement les eleves, mais aussi les enseignants des ecoles primaires et secondaires, les membres du corps professoral des universites, les representants du secteur industriel et ceux des gouvernements. Notre programme a connu des succes importants, et donc il sera maintenu. Nous incitons toute personne interessee a promouvoir l’image des sciences de la Terre a considerer de telles approches nouvelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscience CanadaSame topicGeography Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207