MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1571543791 · doi:10.1109/icufn.2015.7182647

Multi-dimensional clustering and network monitoring system for aeronautical ad hoc networks

2015· article· en· W1571543791 on OpenAlexaff
Soumi Ghosh, Amiya Nayak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetwork partitionComputer sciencePartition (number theory)Wireless ad hoc networkCluster analysisNetwork topologyNetwork simulationMobile ad hoc networkComputer networkDistributed computingDynamic network analysisNetwork monitoringTopology (electrical circuits)EngineeringTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network partition is an inevitable phenomena that prohibits existence of unified robust networks. Partition in static networks occur mainly due to uneven traffic. In mobile networks, a member of the network can be defined using n-dimensions. These dimensions account for the member profile and properties. A multi-dimensional profile can partition the network in multiple ways. Aeronautical ad hoc network (AANET) is a multi-dimensional network. It has a 3D topology spread across the airspace. The high ground speed of the airborne elements changes the network topology rapidly. In this paper, we present an `in-air' network monitoring system for the dynamic AANET environment. The monitoring system deals with the problem of network partitions in AANET by observing the network in n-dimensions. The partitions in the network are identified using multi-dimensional clustering. Multi-dimensional clustering spots the directional behavior in the mobility plane and congestion in the data plane of the network. The dynamic partition detection mitigates the effect of network disruption and accounts for isolated members in the network. The system uses a mixed network design and a quasi-stationary network of higher altitude platforms for achieving ubiquitous network monitoring in the AANET.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207