MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1571850259

Molecular Mechanism(s) of Sex Differences in Lipid Metabolism in Human Skeletal Muscle

2009· dissertation· en· W1571850259 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Amy C. Maher

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Physical Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMechanism (biology)Skeletal muscleLipid metabolismChemistryBiologyBioinformaticsEndocrinologyBiochemistryPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well understood that compared with men, women are better able to withstand starvation, have better ultra-endurance capacity, oxidize more fat during endurance exercise, and are more resistant to fat oxidation defects i.e. diet-induced insulin resistance. However, the mechanism(s) for the observed sex differences are unknown. It was my hypothesis that women have greater fat oxidation capacity in skeletal muscle than men. The objectives of my thesis were to determine the mechanism(s) by which women oxidize more lipids; including the role of estrogen as a possible regulator. The most significant findings were that: 1) mRNA for fatty acid oxidation genes are higher in women compared with men, which was confirmed by Stringent Affymetrix GeneChip array analysis, combined with RT-PCR (chapter 2); 2) long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase in human skeletal muscle is not quantifiable despite the majority (90%) of fatty acids oxidized during exercise are long-chain fatty acids (chapter 3); 3) β-oxidation enzymes: tri-functional protein alpha, very long chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, and medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase are significantly higher in women compared with men (chapter 4); 4) Acute (8 days) 17β-estradiol supplementation in men significantly increased protein content of β-oxidation enzymes in skeletal muscle, possibly through the regulation of PGC-1α and microRNA (chapter 5). In conclusion, my data provided novel insights into the enhanced ability of women to oxidize fat under periods of metabolic stress by showing that: 1) women are transcriptionally (mRNA) "primed" for known physiological differences in metabolism; 2) women have more protein content of the major enzymes involved in long and medium chain fatty acid oxidation; 3) E2 partially regulates lipid metabolism in skeletal muscle by pre-translational modifications of factors involved in β-oxidation. These findings contribute to the molecular understanding of sex differences in substrate utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicGenetics and Physical PerformanceFrench-language works237,207