Accessibilité aux traitements de substitution à la méthadone et réduction des méfaits: Le rôle d'un programme à exigences peu élevées
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectif: L'etude vise a determiner l'efficacite d'un programme de methadone a exigences peu elevees (Relais-Methadone) a rejoindre une clientele de consommateurs d'heroine marginalisee de la region de Montreal, de meme qu'a evaluer son accessibilite en terme de delai de prise en charge et sa capacite de retention en traitement. Methode: Les donnees ont ete recueillies aupres de 141 clients admis lors de la premiere annee d'implantation du programme par le biais de deux instruments a questions ouvertes et a choix multiples. Resultats: L'analyse des caracteristiques de la clientele revele que le programme rejoint efficacement le groupe cible. En effet, celle-ci se caracterise par une frequence et une duree de consommation d'heroine elevees, des conditions de vie precaires et de nombreux comportements a risque pour la transmission du VIH. La periode d'attente en debut de traitement, quant a elle, se chiffre en moyenne a 11,2 jours. Enfin, la retention de la clientele dans le programme est elevee (88 %) pour les premiers 30 jours. Discussion: Ces resultats demontrent la valeur de programmes d'interventions flexibles pour rejoindre une clientele marginalisee fortement exposee au virus du VIH qui n'aurait pas acces a un programme regulier etant donne les criteres de selection eleves et le manque de places disponibles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".