Reductions tarifaires et emploi dans le secteur de la fabrication au Canada, 1988 a 1994
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette etude utilise les donnees sur les entreprises du T2/PALE pour examiner si le lien entre les modifications tarifaires et l'emploi s'est manifeste de facon differente d'une entreprise a l'autre affichant des caracteristiques de productivite et de levier financier differentes au cours de la periode 1988 a 1994. Les resultats indiquent que l'effet combine des reductions tarifaires au Canada et aux Etats-Unis sur l'emploi a ete peu eleve, mais que les pertes ont ete beaucoup plus importantes au sein des entreprises moins productives. Par exemple, les entreprises a productivite moyenne en 1988 ont reagi aux modifications tarifaires en diminuant leurs effectifs de seulement 3, 6 % entre 1988 et 1994, alors que les entreprises de plus faible productivite ont typiquement diminue leurs effectifs de 15, 1 % au cours de cette periode. L'etude indique aussi que les entreprises plus endettees ont davantage reduit leurs effectifs a la suite de la diminution des tarifs, ce qui demontre que les conditions de credit sont devenues plus contraignantes au moment de la mise en application des diminutions tarifaires. Ces resultats semblent indiquer que les entreprises a productivite elevee et a faible endettement ont ete moins susceptibles que les autres de ressentir les effets de la diminution des tarifs canadiens et americains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".