MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1572680999 · doi:10.4271/2005-01-1727

Nitrogen Oxide Production in a Diesel Engine Fueled by Natural Gas

2005· article· en· W1572680999 on OpenAlexaff
Philip G. Hill, Gordon McTaggart-Cowan

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNOxCombustionNitrogen oxideDiesel fuelDiesel engineChemistryMole fractionNatural gasFraction (chemistry)Exhaust gas recirculationOxygenEnvironmental scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ThermodynamicsEnvironmental chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="htmlview paragraph">The effect of large exhaust gas re-circulation (EGR) quantities on NOx production in a natural-gas-fueled direct-injection heavy-duty diesel engine has been tested over a range of speed, load, and timing in controlled experiments with a single-cylinder engine. At the highest EGR ratio, as much as 50% of the cylinder- out NOx was NO<sub>2</sub>. NOx results correlated well with oxygen mole fraction in the unburned gas because of the direct dependence of flame temperature on this quantity. Within the range of measurements, speed and load had little or no effect on the relationship between oxygen mole fraction and NOx production.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">A multi-zone model for estimating combustion rate, flame temperature, wall heat transfer, and NOx production from engine operating conditions and the record of cylinder pressure development with crank angle, was used to interpret experimental measurements. The model showed the incompatibility of test data with the normal form of the extended Zeldovich model on NO production. However a modified form of it served to correlate experimental data with oxygen mole fraction - which was a nearly linear function of flame temperature. The model also served to represent the effects of engine timing (defined here as the crank angle corresponding to 50% cumulative indicated heat release) on NOx production. At highest EGR (lowest oxygen mole fraction) the NOx emissions were of the order of 1 g/kg of fuel. At this condition CO and unburned hydrocarbon emissions were high, indicating the need for enhanced burning rate.</div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207