MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Thought of Taking CPPCC As Chinese Professional Supervisory Institution of Unconstitutional Behavior in Applying Law

2011· article· en· W1572741729 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qian Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOmbudsman and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationPolitical scienceLawLegitimacyInstitutionLegislatorHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since unconstitutional behavior has its duality, it is necessary to establish a separate supervisory system of unconstitutional behavior in applying law, which could together with supervisory system of unconstitutional behavior in legislation build Chinese dual-track constitutional supervisory system. The constitutional status of CPPCC is rather obscure, thus it becomes necessary to enrich its main functions by taking it as Chinese professional supervisory institution of unconstitutional behavior in applying law. As the origins of the legitimacy of People’s Republic of China, the core elements of “people's democratic dictatorship” and representatives of differentiated public opinions, CPPCC is competent in its new role and is not contradictory with institutions of Chinese National People's Congress. This paper expounds how to build Chinese supervisory system of unconstitutional behavior in applying law under the management of CPPCC’s chairman conference from perspectives of its composition, terms, proceedings and sanctions. Key words: CPPCC; Constitutional supervision; Unconstitutional behavior in applying law Resume: Depuis que le comportement inconstitutionnel a sa dualite, il est necessaire d'etablir un systeme distinct de surveillance de comportement inconstitutionnel dans l'application de la loi, ce qui pourrait en collaboration avec le systeme de surveillance de comportement inconstitutionnel dans la legislation chinoise construire a deux voies systeme constitutionnel de surveillance. Le statut constitutionnel de la CCPPC est assez obscure, il devient ainsi necessaire d'enrichir ses principales fonctions en le prenant comme le chinois institution de surveillance de conduite professionnelle dans l'application de la loi inconstitutionnelle. Comme les origines de la legitimite de la Republique populaire de Chine, les elements de base de «dictature democratique du peuple et des representants de differencier les opinions publiques, la CCPPC est competent dans son nouveau role et n'est pas contradictoire avec les institutions de l'Assemblee populaire nationale chinoise du. Ce document expose la facon de construire chinoise systeme de surveillance du comportement inconstitutionnel en appliquant le droit, sous la direction du president de la conference de la CCPPC a partir de perspectives de sa composition, les modalites, les procedures et les sanctions. Mots cles: La CCPPC; Controle constitutionnel; Le comportement anticonstitutionnel en appliquant le droit

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicOmbudsman and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207