MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Thought of Taking CPPCC As Chinese Professional Supervisory Institution of Unconstitutional Behavior in Applying Law

2011· article· en· W1572741729 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOmbudsman and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationPolitical scienceLawLegitimacyInstitutionLegislatorHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since unconstitutional behavior has its duality, it is necessary to establish a separate supervisory system of unconstitutional behavior in applying law, which could together with supervisory system of unconstitutional behavior in legislation build Chinese dual-track constitutional supervisory system. The constitutional status of CPPCC is rather obscure, thus it becomes necessary to enrich its main functions by taking it as Chinese professional supervisory institution of unconstitutional behavior in applying law. As the origins of the legitimacy of People’s Republic of China, the core elements of “people's democratic dictatorship” and representatives of differentiated public opinions, CPPCC is competent in its new role and is not contradictory with institutions of Chinese National People's Congress. This paper expounds how to build Chinese supervisory system of unconstitutional behavior in applying law under the management of CPPCC’s chairman conference from perspectives of its composition, terms, proceedings and sanctions. Key words: CPPCC; Constitutional supervision; Unconstitutional behavior in applying law Resume: Depuis que le comportement inconstitutionnel a sa dualite, il est necessaire d'etablir un systeme distinct de surveillance de comportement inconstitutionnel dans l'application de la loi, ce qui pourrait en collaboration avec le systeme de surveillance de comportement inconstitutionnel dans la legislation chinoise construire a deux voies systeme constitutionnel de surveillance. Le statut constitutionnel de la CCPPC est assez obscure, il devient ainsi necessaire d'enrichir ses principales fonctions en le prenant comme le chinois institution de surveillance de conduite professionnelle dans l'application de la loi inconstitutionnelle. Comme les origines de la legitimite de la Republique populaire de Chine, les elements de base de «dictature democratique du peuple et des representants de differencier les opinions publiques, la CCPPC est competent dans son nouveau role et n'est pas contradictoire avec les institutions de l'Assemblee populaire nationale chinoise du. Ce document expose la facon de construire chinoise systeme de surveillance du comportement inconstitutionnel en appliquant le droit, sous la direction du president de la conference de la CCPPC a partir de perspectives de sa composition, les modalites, les procedures et les sanctions. Mots cles: La CCPPC; Controle constitutionnel; Le comportement anticonstitutionnel en appliquant le droit

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it