Visões de Família e Tradição na Escrita de Dionne Brand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo tem como objetivo discutir as visoes de familia e tradicao nas obras da escritora canadense, nascida no Caribe, Dionne Brand. Sao duas as principais obras analisadas: At the Full and Change of the Moon e What We All Long For. O enfoque teorico consiste de artigos e livros das areas da critica pos-colonial e da teoria da diaspora contemporânea, levando em consideracao o fato de Dionne Brand ser uma escritora imigrante e de essa caracteristica influenciar profundamente a sua escrita. A analise das obras sera feita com um enfoque comparativo e contrastivo, estudando assim as diferencas e as semelhancas entre as duas obras e, ao mesmo tempo, estabelecendo uma conexao entre ambas. Na posicao de sujeito diasporico, Brand oferece perspectivas a respeito das duas culturas nas e entre as quais transita, colocando-as lado a lado e possibilitando, assim, uma reflexao e um questionamento a respeito do que as une e do que as separa. Analisando os conceitos de familia e tradicao presentes nas obras e possivel ver o papel dos valores tradicionais e familiares caribenhos e como eles sao diferentes, nao apenas no Canada, mas no modo de viver da sociedade moderna. As exigencias modernas e capitalistas acabam por dar grande enfase no individuo, o que rompe lacos familiares e distancia as pessoas de alguma ideia de tradicao.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".