Vigabatrin‐associated reversible MRI signal changes in patients with infantile spasms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of pediatric patients with infantile spasms (IS) treated with vigabatrin (VGB) in order to investigate whether VGB affects the brain. METHODS: One hundred seven pediatric patients diagnosed with IS and treated with (n = 95) >or=120 mg/kg/day VGB or without (n = 12) VGB were included. MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Of the patients who had MRI scans during, but not before, VGB treatment (n = 81), 25 (30.9%) exhibited abnormal MRI signal intensity and/or restricted DWI in the deep gray nuclei and brainstem. Follow-up scans (performed in 15 of the 25 patients) revealed that these changes were reversible upon withdrawal of the medication. Analysis of patients undergoing scans before, during, and after VGB treatment (n = 14) revealed that four patients had abnormal MRI signal during treatment with VBG, two of whom reversed with cessation of VGB, one reversed without cessation of VGB, and another had persistent abnormal signal while being weaned from the VGB. Patients who had not received VGB treatment (n = 12) displayed normal imaging. Younger infants (<or=12 months) and those with cryptogenic IS were more likely to develop abnormal signal changes on MRI during VGB treatment. DISCUSSION: In pediatric patients, VGB induces reversible MRI signal changes and reversible diffusion restriction in the globi pallidi, thalami, brainstem, and dentate nuclei. The risk for this phenomenon was greater in younger infants and patients with cryptogenic IS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".