MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1573926539 · doi:10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.tmp94

Abstract T MP94: Congestive Heart (or Cardiac) Failure: Risk Factors, Clinical Features and Outcomes in Patients With an Acute Ischemic Stroke

2014· article· en· W1573926539 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jitphapa Pongmoragot, Gustavo Saposnik, Douglas S. Lee, Tai Hwan Park, Jiming Fang, Peter C. Austin

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesToronto General HospitalSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureInternal medicineStroke (engine)Atrial fibrillationCardiologyDiabetes mellitusHyperlipidemiaCoronary artery diseaseModified Rankin ScaleRisk factorIschemic strokeIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a relatively common comorbid condition in stroke patients. Limited information is known regarding CHF in patients with an acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Objective: We evaluated clinical characteristics, predisposing factors, and outcomes in stroke patients with history of CHF. Methods: We prospectively included AIS patients admitted to the institutions participating in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network (RCSN) between 2003 and 2008. History of chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) determined from medical records, physical examination and investigations. Primary outcome was death or disability at discharge (modified Rankin scale equal to or greater than 3). Secondary outcomes included admission ICU, disposition, length of hospital stay, death at 3 months and at 1 year and 30 day hospital readmissions. Logistic regression and survival analyses were performed to determine the association of risk factors with the outcomes of interest. Results: Among 12,686 patients with AIS, CHF was found in 1152 (9.1%) of patients. Mean age was 78.5±11 years. CHF patients were more likely to have hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, vulvular heart disease and peripheral vascular disease. CHF more likely presented with a severe stroke (25.8% vs 14.1%, p<0.0001) and cardioembolic stroke subtype (42.2% vs 21.3%, p<0.0001). CHF was associated with higher risk of death at 30-days (24.2% vs 11.2%; p<0.0001) and at 1-year (44% vs 20.6;p<0.0001) and disability at discharge (70.3% vs 56%; p<0.0001). Mean length of stay was longer in stroke patients with CHF (15.51±23.91 vs 12.65±19.76 ; p=0.013). In the multivariate analysis, CHF (OR 1.18; 95%CI 1.01- 1.37) was an independent predictor of death and disability after adjusting age, stroke severity, and other comorbid conditions. Conclusions: In this large cohort study, CHF occurred in 9.1% of AIS patients. Stroke patients with CHF had poorer outcomes and longer hospitalization. Furthermore, after adjusting age, stroke severity and comorbidity, CHF was an independent predictor of death and disability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→