Symbiosis, Morphology, and Phylogeny of Hoplonymphidae (Parabasalia) of the Wood-Feeding Roach Cryptocercus punctulatus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anaerobic cellulolytic flagellate protists of the hindguts of lower termites and the wood-feeding cockroach Cryptocercus are essential to their host's ability to digest lignocellulose. Many have bacteria associated with their surfaces and within cytoplasmic vesicles-likely important symbioses as suggested by molecular and other data. Some of the most striking examples of these symbioses are in the parabasalid family Hoplonymphidae, but little or no data exist on the structural aspects of their symbioses, their relationships with bacteria through different life-cycle stages, or their diversity and phylogenetic relationships in Cryptocercus. We investigated these areas in the hoplonymphid genera Barbulanympha and Urinympha from Cryptocercus punctulatus using light and electron microscopy, and analysis of small subunit rRNA. Microscopy reveals variation in density of bacterial surface symbionts related to life-cycle stage, a glyococalyx possibly important in bacterial adhesion and/or metabolite exchange, and putative viruses associated with bacterial surface symbionts. Patterning of surface bacteria suggests protists emerging from the resistant (dormant) stage are colonized by a small population of bacterial cells, which then divide to cover their surface. Additionally, cytoplasmic protrusions from the protist are covered by bacteria. Phylogenetic analysis rejects the monophyly of Hoplonymphidae, suggesting multiple origins or losses of these bacterial symbioses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".