MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1574323862 · doi:10.5376/mpb.2014.05.0010

Deep Sequencing of the Pistil Transcriptome in the Cross Incompatible Maize

2014· article· en· W1574323862 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Song Li, Chunyan Xu, Dezhou Cui, Huaihua Liu, Peng Li, Hua Zhang, Detao Li, Youhui Tian, Huabang Chen, Xianrong Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Plant Breeding · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTranscriptomeGynoeciumGeneticsDNA sequencingGeneComputational biologyBotanyStamenGene expressionPollen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plant reproductive development is dependent on successful pollen-pistil interactions. The high degree of specificity in pollen-pistil interactions and the precision of directional pollen tube growth suggest that signals are continually being exchanged between pollen tubes and cells of the pistil that line their path. However, with few exceptions, little is known about the genes that control these interactions. In this investigation, we performed genome-wide transcriptional profiling of pistil tissues of Gametophytic factor1-Strong (Ga1-S) genotype maize after pollination 5 hours(5HAP)with Ga1-S pollen and ga1 pollen respectively , in an attempt to isolate genes involved in pollen tube elongation in maize pistils, using the Solexa deep sequencing technology. The results of this study suggest that the regulation of reinforcing, modifying, or remodeling the structure of the transmitting tract and the pollen tube tip play a critical role in pollen-pistil interactions during pollen tube elongation in maize pistils, and the inhibition of these functions maybe the molecular mechanism of how Gametophytic factor1-Strong (Ga1-S) presence in style tissue completely prevents ga1 pollen to accomplish fertilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Plant BreedingSame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207