Environnement familial au Burkina Faso : typologie et cohabitation parents-enfants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude décrit l’environnement familial desenfants et des adolescents du Burkina Faso au moyen des donnéesdes Enquêtes démographiques et de santé (EDS) de1993 et de 2003 et de l’Enquête nationale sur lesadolescents de 2004 et elle explore la relation entre la cohabitationparentale et les caractéristiques du chef de ménage, duménage et des enfants ou des adolescents ainsi que lascolarisation de ces derniers. Les résultats montrent que lamajorité des enfants (78,4 % en 1993 et 77,6 % en2003) et des adolescents (61,1 % en 2004) vit auprès de sesdeux parents, en union monogame ou polygame. La proportion des enfantset des adolescents orphelins, qu’ils soient confiés oucohabitant avec un seul parent, est non négligeable. C’estdans l’adolescence que la cohabitation avec les deux parents estla moins répandue. La cohabitation avec les parents estassociée significativement aux caractéristiques du chefde ménage, du ménage, des enfants et des adolescentsainsi qu’à la scolarisation de ces deux groupes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".