Apuntes sobre la organización jurisdiccional del territorio vizcaíno en los siglos XII-XIV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMEN: Este artículo trata de evaluar el contexto político-social en el que vieron la luz las primeras estructuras urbanas del señorío de Vizcaya, analizando en modo particular los casos de las villas de Orduña y Bilbao, fundadas en el último cuarto del siglo XII y en el año 1300 respectivamente. De igual modo, se interpretan las relaciones mantenidas por ambas con las estructuras señoriales y los centros de población del territorio circundante, con la intención de aportar una nueva visión a la relación dialéctica entre los centros urbanos y su hinterhnd rural en Vizcaya durante los siglos XII al XIV. ABSTRACT: This paper aims at exploring the socio-political context in which were shaping the first urban structures in Biscay. It is focused on the analysis of two of the most significant towns in that area, such as Orduña and Bilbao, which were respectively founded in the last quarter of twelfth century and in 1300. The article points out the relationships that theses towns developed with the rural lordships and with the settlements placed around them, making a new view about the dialectical links between urban centres and their rural hinterland in Biscay from twelfth to fourteenth centuries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".