Subsurface Conductive and Hydrogeological Related Thermal Effects in the Area of the Crustal Electrical Conductors of the Williston Basin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heat flow estimates for the Mesozoic sediments of the Williston Basin show a strong correlation with ground surface topography and hydraulic head and so the conductive heat flux from the crystalline crust and upper mantle is masked. The observed correlation has been interpreted as due to the effect of water motion which occurs in permeable Lower Mesozoic aquifers (Majorowicz et al. 1986; Gosnold, 1985). The lack of a similar correlation for the heat flow through deeper Paleozoic formations suggests less influence by the gravity driven hydrodynamic effect there and deep sedimentary heat flow anomalies correlate with deep crustal structures found by other independent methods. The elongated heat flow anomaly found in southern Saskatchewan from heat flow studies in Paleozoic strata (Majorowicz et al. 1986) extends into North Dakota as reported by Price et al. (1986) who based his observations on S2 pyrolysis peak studies. The anomaly shown in Figure 1 lies east of the North American Central Plains electrical conductivity anomaly (NACP) as defined by Alabi et al. (1975). However, it coincides with electrical conductivity anomalies observed from magnetotelluric studies by Jones and Savage (1986) and Rankin and Pascal (pers.comm., 1987).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".