MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1574808413 · doi:10.1159/000158893

Intracellular pH Measurement with Fluorescent Dye in Canine Basilar Arteries

2008· article· en· W1574808413 on OpenAlexaff
Jiankun Yu, Jason Zheng, B. Y. Ong, R Bose

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Vessels · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryFluorescenceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Intracellular pHCalibration curveIntracellularDetection limitChromatographyBiochemistryOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intracellular pH (pHi) of basilar artery rings was determined with 2',7'-bis-(carboxyethyl)-5,(6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF) by measuring the ratio of emitted (540 nm) fluorescence intensities (FI) at excitation wavelengths of 500 and 440 nm. There was a dye loss from the rings in 90 min (39.3 +/- 3.6%, p less than 0.001). We found that the ratio of fluorescence intensities does not adequately correct for dye loss; hence, we derived a method to correct for dye loss during pHi determinations. Calibration curves of the ratio versus pHi were constructed for the artery rings. The slope and intercept of the calibration curves depended on FI440. Linear regression lines for the slope and intercept versus FI440 were: [formula; see text] In solutions with different pH and different concentrations of free BCECF, the slope of the ratio versus pH of the solution was steeper at high concentrations of BCECF. Thus, pHi was calculated from a calibration curve in which the slope and intercept were determined from FI440 with the above formula. The corrected pHi was 7.37 +/- 0.05 (n = 25) at pHo 7.4 and 37 degrees C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood VesselsSame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207