Review of J. B. Lethbridge (ed.), Edmund Spenser: New and Renewed Directions (Madison, Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2006)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relationship between B vitamin status and cognitive function has been of interest for many years. There is evidence of relationships between intake and status of folate and vitamin B-12 with neurological, cognitive, and memory impairment, but results have been inconsistent. Plasma B-12, erythrocyte folate, methylmalonic acid,and homocysteine were evaluated as predictors of cognitive function in a large population based sample of Latino elderly living in the Sacramento, California region. The hypothesis tested was that low folate and/or B-12 status predicts cognitive function impairment and dementia. Logistic regression was used to examine the differences in B-vitamin status by cognitive function category. Erythrocyte folate was related to dementia after controlling for age, gender, education, income, diabetes diagnosis, serum creatinine, and depressive symptoms. The highest prevalence of low erythrocyte folate occurred in the Dementia group and was significantly higher than in the Normal group. Plasma B-12, MMA, Hcy, and prevalence of a normal values for these variables, were not significantly different among the cognitive function classes. We conclude that folate status is associated with dementia but that more research is needed on the relationship between vitaminB-12 status, Hcy and cognitive function to explore possible associations with these parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".