MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1575319949 · doi:10.1109/icc.2015.7248923

Solving the performance puzzle of DSRC multi-channel operations

2015· article· en· W1575319949 on OpenAlexafffund
Kai Xiong, Xi Chen, Lei Rao, Xue Liu, Yuan Yao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDedicated short-range communicationsThroughputComputer scienceReliability (semiconductor)Computer networkChannel (broadcasting)Network packetControl channelSoftware deploymentPacket lossWirelessInterval (graph theory)Key (lock)Duration (music)Vehicular ad hoc networkReal-time computingTelecommunicationsWireless ad hoc networkComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) protocol is a key enabling technology for enhancing road safety and transportation efficiency. Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE) 1609.4 is a new amendment that enables multi-channel operations in DSRC. Operating intervals are divided into alternating Control Channel (CCH) Intervals and Service Channel (SCH) Intervals with an identical length. This alternating feature causes high packet losses in CCH and low throughput in SCH, and thus hinders the deployment of this protocol. The goal of our work is to provision sufficient reliability for safety messages in CCH while optimising non-safety service delivery in SCH. We develop analytical models to explore the relationship among traffic density, CCH packet loss ratio, SCH throughput, and the duration of each kind of intervals. We also design a multi-channel coordination algorithm which adaptively adjusts the duration of intervals to achieve better performance and reliability based on these models. Theoretical analysis and extensive simulation results demonstrate the accuracy of our model and the efficacy of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207