MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1575565134 · doi:10.1002/9780470986882.ch63

Clinical Applications of External Evidence

2002· other· en· W1575565134 on OpenAlexaff
Ernest L. Fallen, Salim Yusuf

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesPopulation Health Research InstituteMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSection (typography)Evidence-based medicinePsychologyMedicineComputer scienceAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter contains sections titled: Evidence-based v patient centered medicine? Not an either/or choice Recognizing the limitations of external evidence Recognizing the limitations of patient centered medicine Some principles of application Section preview

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.277
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.637
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.891

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2770.637
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0120.008
Science and technology studies0.0040.017
Scholarly communication0.0290.021
Open science0.0050.018
Research integrity0.0150.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.492
GPT teacher head0.599
Teacher spread0.107 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207