Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Québec, le romancier du XIXe siècle est généralement perçu, par la critique littéraire, comme un promoteur de l’identité nationale. Ce verdict semble d’autant plus crédible que les auteurs de l’époque affirment écrire des œuvres catholiques et patriotiques. Or, on se demande, dans ce cas, ce qui les pousse à mettre en scène, dans leurs œuvres, des personnages d’écrivains inspirés des clichés du romantisme et du réalisme balzacien. C’est ce que nous tenterons d’expliquer en nous penchant sur les romans de Pierre-Joseph-Olivier Chauveau et d’Antoine Gérin-Lajoie, Charles Guérin et Jean Rivard.AbstractNineteenth-century Quebec novelists are generally perceived in literary criticism as being strong promoters of national identity. This verdict seems to be particularly credible considering these authors claimed to write catholic and patriotic works. However, one wonders what motivated them to portray characters of writers inspired by clichés of romanticism and Balzacian realism. We intend to explain this misperception by looking at Pierre-Joseph-Olivier Chauveau’s novel Charles Guérin as well as Antoine Gérin-Lajoie’s Jean Rivard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".