MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1576353184

La femme musulmane au Canada: profane ou sacrée?

2007· article· fr· W1576353184 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pascale Fournier

Bibliographic record

VenueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecularismMulticulturalismPluralism (philosophy)NeutralityReligious studiesHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyEthnologyIslamPolitical scienceTheologyLawEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entre la laicite et le pluralisme institutionnel, entre l'universalisme et le relativisme culturel, entre ladite neutralite de la sphere publique et le multiculturalisme constitutionnalise, le murmure de la femme musulmane devient inaudible, efface par deux discours diametralement opposes se tenant taille et epousant, comme porte-etendard, l'un la majorite blanche non musulmane et l'autre la majorite masculine musulmane. Cet article vise a lever les paupieres de la laicite et du multiculturalisme ideologiques pour mieux delimiter le monde distributif offert aux femmes musulmanes dans cette volonte de rejeter ou de chanter les louanges de la danse identitaire. Abstract: Between secularism and institutional pluralism, between universalism and cultural relativism, and between the said neutrality of the public sphere and the Constitution's expressed multiculturalism, lies the Muslim woman whose untold murmurs are excoriated by two diametrically opposed discourses: on the one hand, the white, non-Muslim majority; on the other, the male Muslim majority. This article is an attempt at piercing the veil of secularism and multiculturalism to better outline the distributional narrative that permeates Muslim women's lives as they navigate around the impossible dilemma of identity politics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Same topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207