MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1576903328 · doi:10.3138/flor.17.013

Speaking the Truth: God's Law and Prophecy in <i>Seinte Katerine</i>

2000· article· en· W1576903328 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Patricia Sunderland

Bibliographic record

VenueFlorilegium · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegendSAINTPopularityHistoryPoliticsLiteraturePhilosophyClassicsArt historyArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The early thirteenth-century Seinte Katerine, of the "Katherine Group" of anchoritic works, readily lends itself to comparison with two groups of texts. The companion saints' lives of Juliana and Margaret provide an obvious starting point: the three legends are associated in several manuscripts, they share a common genre, and they even have a number of themes and plot elements in common. Secondly, this version of the legend of Saint Katherine of Alexandria is one of many extant accounts of that saint's martyrdom, each of which varies from the others in details, but also in major elements. Jacqueline Jenkins has recently observed that "the ability to adapt, and in so doing represent or reflect contemporary social, political or religious trends, is an important feature of the St Katherine legends, and must account for a large part of the saint's enduring popularity." A number of scholars have noted that Katherine stands apart from Juliana and Margaret as much as she shares common features with them. However, the distinctive features of Scinte Kriterine, relative both to Seinte Juliene and Seinte Margarete and to other versions of the Katherine legend, warrant further attention. Foremost among these features is the thirteenth-century author's emphasis upon Katherine's learnedness in, and fidelity to, God's law. While this feature is present in the stories of Juliana and Margaret, and in various portrayals of Katherine, it achieves prominence uniquely in the Seinte Katerine legend. Two related themes in that legend appear to be inextricable from its focus on God's law: the author's emphasis on his heroine's "true belief," and her association with the great prophets of Holy Scripture. This multi-faceted focus results in a text which fashions Katherine (an alleged fourth-century Alexandrian saint who probably never existed) into an embodiment, in a single life, of the principles which were central to the lives of its anchoritic readers—even though Katherine's actions would not have served as literal models for their own.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.034
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFlorilegiumSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207