MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1577086563 · doi:10.1109/eeeic.2015.7165427

Impact of Ferroresonance on protective relays in Manitoba Hydro 230 kV electrical network

2015· article· en· W1577086563 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Salman Rezaei

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFerroresonance in electricity networksTrippingTransformerCircuit breakerProtective relayElectrical engineeringElectric power systemEngineeringPower-system protectionElectrical networkOvervoltagePower networkReliability engineeringRelayVoltagePower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Catastrophic circumstances and equipment failures in electrical networks are mostly caused by emerging unidentified phenomena. Resonance and Ferroresonance are those phenomena, which have been investigated since, many years ago. Manitoba Hydro 230 kV electrical network has experienced Ferroresonant states several times. Such conditions may occur in effect of short circuit, breaker phase failure, transformer energizing, load rejection, accidental or scheduled line disconnection, and plant outage. One of the significant consequences of resonant and Ferroresonant states can be an apparent mis-operation or tripping some protective devices and inaccurate operation of instrument transformers. In this paper by means of PSCAD/EMTDC simulation software, Ferroresonant states are analyzed in Manitoba Hydro 230 kV network. Ferroresonant states are classified in to adequate modes by Ferroresonance detection tools, furthermore; kinds of protective relays subjected to Ferroresonance are simulated in the power network, and operation of relays is assessed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207