MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1578070690

超大型Ni—Cu(Pt)岩浆矿床的划分与找矿

2002· article· ja· W1578070690 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
汤中立

Bibliographic record

Venue地质与勘探 · 2002
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

提出超大型Ni-Cu(Pt)岩浆硫化物矿床的划分标准为:Ni储量≥50万 t,Ni品位≥1%,若Ni品位<1%其中共生元素Cu或Pt族达到经济品位者;超巨型矿床的划分标准为:Ni储量≥500万 t,Ni品位≥1%,若Ni品位<1%其中共生元素Cu或Pt族达到经济品位者.按照这种标准全世界有超大型矿床9个、超巨型矿床3个.确定并论述了超大(巨)型Ni-Cu(Pt)岩浆硫化物矿床的五种类型和它们的地质定位条件和特征.这五种类型为(1)元古宙与古陨石坑有关的苏长岩-辉长岩型矿床,如萨德伯里(Sudbury);(2)元古宙与大陆边缘裂解有关的小侵入体矿床,如金川、沃依塞湾(Voisey Bay);(3)显生宙与大陆裂谷有关的相当于溢流玄武岩的侵入体矿床,如诺里尔斯克(Noril′sk)、十月(Oktyabri′skiy)、塔尔纳赫(Talnakh)、太梅尔(Tamyr)等;(4)太古宙绿岩带与科马提岩有关的矿床,如西澳阿格纽(Agnew)、康巴尔达(Kconbalda)、基斯山(Mt.Keith),加拿大汤普逊(Thompson)带的矿床;(5)早元古代大陆层状侵入杂岩体中硫化物与铂族元素,如布什维尔德(Bushveld)等.预测中国最有找矿前景的是(2)类型矿床,(3)(4)两种类型在我国亦具有形成超大型矿床的地质条件.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue地质与勘探→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→