MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1578357700 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.167.8.4345

Cytokines Regulate the Capacity of CD8α+ and CD8α− Dendritic Cells to Prime Th1/Th2 Cells In Vivo

2001· article· en· W1578357700 on OpenAlexaff
Roberto Maldonado-López, Charlie Maliszewski, Jacques Urbain, Muriel Moser

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsResearch & Development Corporation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD8Cytotoxic T cellPrime (order theory)Cell biologyIn vivoChemistryBiologyImmunologyIn vitroImmune systemMathematicsBiochemistryBiotechnologyCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prior studies have shown that subclasses of dendritic cells (DC) direct the development of distinct Th populations in rodents and in humans. In the mouse, we have recently shown that administration of Ag-pulsed CD8alpha(-) DC induces a Th2-type response, whereas injection of CD8alpha(+) DC leads to Th1 differentiation. To define the DC-derived factors involved in the polarization of Th responses, we injected either subset purified from mice genetically deficient for IFN-gamma, IL-4, IL-12, or IL-10 into wild-type animals. In this work, we report that DC-derived IL-12 and IFN-gamma are required for Th1 priming by CD8alpha(+) DC, whereas IL-10 is required for optimal development of Th2 cells by CD8alpha(-) DC. The level of IL-12 produced by the DC appears to determine the Th1/Th2 balance in vivo. We further show that the function of DC subsets displays some flexibility. Treatment of DC with IL-10 in vitro induces a selective decrease in the viability of CD8alpha(+) DC. Conversely, incubation with IFN-gamma down-regulates the Th2-promoting capacities of CD8alpha(-) DC and increases the Th1-skewing properties of both subsets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations216
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207