Replenishing the earth: the settler revolution and the rise of the Anglo-world, 1783-1939
Bibliographic record
Abstract
James Belich's Replenishing the Earth is a fascinating and accessible volume that explores the story of the "Anglophone settler explosion" (21) during the long nineteenth century.To illuminate the scope and importance of this process, Belich compares and contrasts settlements in the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa.This is a rich and complicated story, and Belich's engaging writing style draws readers in.His prose conveys both his enthusiasm for his research and the stakes of his claims.Belich wants nothing less than to explain how Great Britain and its "newlands" (86) came to dominate the world culturally, economically, and politically during the nineteenth century and into the twentieth.His answers are compelling and offer much for other historians to engage.Belich draws on and engages a vast array of literature and covers a lot of geographic ground without sacrificing clarity, partly because the book is so well organized.The first section establishes Belich's general themes to explain the development and rise of the Anglophone world.These include the mass transfer of people, information, and goods, as well as the ideology of "settlerism" (153).Subsequent chapters test Belich's explanations in a range of places, moving from London to New York, Chicago to Melbourne, with attention to how the hinterlands of these cities expanded and shifted over time.Belich compares histories of resource extraction and teases out how cultural ties flourished even as political ones were weakened or severed in the Anglo world.The range of topics covered and juxtaposed is one of the strengths of the volume.This book also provides broader context for those interested in specific parts of the expansion Belich investigates.For those most familiar with the story of American westward expansion, for example, Belich emphasizes the important parallels to its "twin" (79), the British
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".