Caspase-6-Resistant Mutant Huntingtin Does not Rescue the Toxic Effects of Caspase-Cleavable Mutant Huntingtin in vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The amelioration of behavioral and neuropathological deficits in mice expressing caspase-6-resistant (C6R) mutant huntingtin (mhtt), despite the presence of an expanded polyglutamine tract, highlights proteolysis of htt at the 586aa caspase-6 (casp6) site may be an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of Huntington disease (HD). One possible explanation of these effects is that C6R mhtt could act as a dominant negative on mhtt. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To determine if the neuroprotective effect observed in the C6R mice is due to dominant negative effects, we crossed the C6R mice to the YAC128 HD mouse model to generate mice expressing both caspase-cleavable and C6R mhtt (YAC/C6R) concurrently and assessed previously defined behavioral and neuropathological endpoints. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that YAC/C6R animals exhibit similar motor abnormalities and learning deficits as the YAC128 mice. Neuropathological analysis reveals a significant decrease in brain weight and striatal volume in the YAC/C6R mice comparable to the YAC128 mice. In contrast, and similar to previous findings, C6R mice demonstrate preserved brain weight and striatal volume. As expected, body weight is significantly increased in the YAC/C6R mice due to the increased levels of htt. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the lack of an HD phenotype in the C6R mice is most likely due to the absence of cleavage of htt and not due to suppression of expression of mhtt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".