MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1579793494 · doi:10.21236/ada392591

Binary Super Grating (BSG) Self-Collimated Multi-Wavelength Laser

2001· report· en· W1579793494 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin Fay, Jia-Qi Xu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollimated lightGratingOpticsBinary numberWavelengthLaserPhysicsMaterials scienceMathematicsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project concerns the exploration of two novel and enabling technologies: a self-collimated multi-wavelength laser (SCMWL). and the underlying binary supergrating (BSG). on which the SCMWL depends. In this context, the BSG functions as a multi-wavelength reflector which can be implemented by a simple two-level etching process. The SCMWL makes use of BSGs to form a planar cavity with collimated multi-wavelength resonances, when combined with gain, the result is self-collimated multi-wavelength output. This project began at the University of Toronto. under grant number DAAG55-98-0435, where it was demonstrated for the first time that both the BSG and the SCMWL concept work, through implementations in an optically-pumped AlGaAs planar waveguide. After Year 1 of this 2-year project, Professor Xu's lab relocated to Brown University, where work on this project has continued. Here we report on this second year of exploration, in which we have extended and solidified our understanding of SCMWL operation, and developed a measurement methodology for these novel devices. This provides a firm foundation for the next phase of SCMWL development, including electrically-pumped implementations promising greater efficiency and output power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207