<i>H19</i> sense and antisense transgenes modify insulin‐like growth factor‐II mRNA levels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The oppositely-imprinted genes insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF2) and H19, a putative tumor suppressor, often show coordinate, reciprocal regulation and are believed to play a role in carcinogenesis. To explore the possible interactions between these genes, we stably transfected diHepG2 cells with a plasmid containing either the sense or the antisense H19 cDNA sequences and verified their expression by Northern analysis and by RNase protection analysis. Levels of H19, IGF2 and gamma-actin mRNA were quantified by competitive RT-PCR analysis. Although H19 sense transgene overexpression (n = 24 clones) did not decrease the low, basal levels of IGF2 mRNA compared to control cells, levels of IGF2 mRNA were positively correlated with the levels of H19 antisense mRNA (P < 0.0001, n = 40 clones). Furthermore, the increase in IGF2 mRNA level was accompanied by an elevation of IGF-II peptide in conditioned media. To see if H19 mRNA had a specific effect on transcription, we also performed transient transfections with reporter gene constructs containing IGF2 promoter 3 in the presence of sense or antisense H19 cDNA sequences under control of a cytomegalovirus promoter. We show a lower reporter gene activity from reporter gene constructs in the presence of sense H19 cDNA than from those with antisense or neomycin. Our results suggest that H19 participates in the repression of IGF2, at least in part through effects on IGF2 transcription, an effect which may contribute to its action as a tumor suppressor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".